Somewhat Insane Robotic Elimination Challenge
Moderator: Tournament Hosts
-
- Posts: 1140
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
- Contact:
Somewhat Insane Robotic Elimination Challenge
Based off of? Try ripped off! :P
All good, AJ seems to have dissapeared off the face of the planet [I don't even see him on MSN anymore] so I'm sure he won't mind.
All good, AJ seems to have dissapeared off the face of the planet [I don't even see him on MSN anymore] so I'm sure he won't mind.
-
- Posts: 1057
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
- Location: Fort Bragg, NC
Somewhat Insane Robotic Elimination Challenge
<blockquote class='quote_blockquote'><dl><dt>panicattacky2k</dt><dd>Oct 16 2006, 07:46 PM</dd></dl><div> Based off of? Try ripped off! :P
All good, AJ seems to have dissapeared off the face of the planet [I don't even see him on MSN anymore] so I'm sure he won't mind. [/quote]
If you wanna get technical about it, they'd both be a rip off of ShutOUT...
All good, AJ seems to have dissapeared off the face of the planet [I don't even see him on MSN anymore] so I'm sure he won't mind. [/quote]
If you wanna get technical about it, they'd both be a rip off of ShutOUT...
Somewhat Insane Robotic Elimination Challenge
<blockquote class='quote_blockquote'><dl><dt>StarlessSoldier</dt><dd>Oct 16 2006, 03:04 PM</dd></dl><div> <blockquote class='quote_blockquote'><dl><dt>panicattacky2k</dt><dd>Oct 16 2006, 07:46 PM</dd></dl><div> Based off of? Try ripped off! :P
All good, AJ seems to have dissapeared off the face of the planet [I don't even see him on MSN anymore] so I'm sure he won't mind. [/quote]
If you wanna get technical about it, they'd both be a rip off of ShutOUT... [/quote]
The person who designed the concept for that robot never knew ARC even existed when he created that robot. So it's not exactly a rip off, if you did want to get technical.
All good, AJ seems to have dissapeared off the face of the planet [I don't even see him on MSN anymore] so I'm sure he won't mind. [/quote]
If you wanna get technical about it, they'd both be a rip off of ShutOUT... [/quote]
The person who designed the concept for that robot never knew ARC even existed when he created that robot. So it's not exactly a rip off, if you did want to get technical.
Somewhat Insane Robotic Elimination Challenge
id like to enter but i probably wont have 4 bots done before 8 people sign up..
-
- Posts: 1140
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
- Contact:
Somewhat Insane Robotic Elimination Challenge
FAAACE, with this activity, you'd get in before a 4th person gets in. :P Go on, take your time. Come 07 there still won't be 8 people I bet. XD
Somewhat Insane Robotic Elimination Challenge
I have 1-ish. Maybe we could split it up, and share the same spot, if we can't come up with anything?
-
- Posts: 6889
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
- Location: E-Town, PA
- Team: Team Blood Gulch
- Contact:
Somewhat Insane Robotic Elimination Challenge
Team Blood Gulch
LW- Zombie Killer
Control - 10
Speed - 15
Torque - 10
Armor - 15
Weapon - 0
MW- Rooster Teeth
Control - 7
Speed - 7
Torque - 4
Armor - 7
Weapon - 25
HW- The Arbiter
Control - 10
Speed - 11
Torque - 10
Armor - 11
Weapon - 8
SHW- The Godfather Part II
Control - 10
Speed - 10
Torque - 8
Armor - 10
Weapon - 12
LW- Zombie Killer
Control - 10
Speed - 15
Torque - 10
Armor - 15
Weapon - 0
MW- Rooster Teeth
Control - 7
Speed - 7
Torque - 4
Armor - 7
Weapon - 25
HW- The Arbiter
Control - 10
Speed - 11
Torque - 10
Armor - 11
Weapon - 8
SHW- The Godfather Part II
Control - 10
Speed - 10
Torque - 8
Armor - 10
Weapon - 12
Area51Escapee,Jan 30 2011 wrote:It sucks going 0-5. You lose all 4 of your bot fights for the week and you also lose at life.Spatula,Jan 29 2011 wrote: I should go 3-1 this week but it'll probably be something like 0-4 or 0-5.
-
- Posts: 1140
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
- Contact:
Somewhat Insane Robotic Elimination Challenge
Well, that's halfway in...Guess it's going good after all.
Didn't Minion say he was going to enter? Ah well. I don't think we need him. With FAAACE and possibly MR, that makes...Yeah, we probably DO need him. XD
Didn't Minion say he was going to enter? Ah well. I don't think we need him. With FAAACE and possibly MR, that makes...Yeah, we probably DO need him. XD
-
- Posts: 1140
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
- Contact:
Somewhat Insane Robotic Elimination Challenge
Veeerry nice looking CADs, Starless.
That's 5 now..and I thought this wouldn't be budging. On second thought FAAACE, you might want to hurry up. :P
That's 5 now..and I thought this wouldn't be budging. On second thought FAAACE, you might want to hurry up. :P
-
- Posts: 1057
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
- Location: Fort Bragg, NC
Somewhat Insane Robotic Elimination Challenge
OK, quick rule clarification. I don't think much has changed since I used to do this but I wanna confirm. Separate plows, hinged wedges, armor separate from the chassis... so on so forth is Armor stat +2. Primary weapons (spinning discs/shells, flipping arms, hammers, etc.) are as durable as the weapon stat itself, or armor +3, whichever is higher. Is that still the rule?
Somewhat Insane Robotic Elimination Challenge
I fucking love it when Omega makes CADs. It's like art.
-
- Posts: 1140
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
- Contact:
Somewhat Insane Robotic Elimination Challenge
<blockquote class='quote_blockquote'><dl><dt>StarlessSoldier</dt><dd>Oct 18 2006, 04:43 AM</dd></dl><div> OK, quick rule clarification. I don't think much has changed since I used to do this but I wanna confirm. Separate plows, hinged wedges, armor separate from the chassis... so on so forth is Armor stat +2. Primary weapons (spinning discs/shells, flipping arms, hammers, etc.) are as durable as the weapon stat itself, or armor +3, whichever is higher. Is that still the rule? [/quote]
Ack. This one TOTALLY slipped my mind. Sorry about that.
Okay..I'll edit this into the firstpost when it's done here.
To prevent uberweapons that do tons of damage and are pratically indestructable, all pats of the robot's durability, including the weapon, are equal to the armor stat.
And to prevent plowbots from royally owning FBSs, no armor +2 rule.
Considering that will screw charybids over a bit, you're free to redo the stats. Once again I apologize, I can't belive I forgot about that.
Ack. This one TOTALLY slipped my mind. Sorry about that.
Okay..I'll edit this into the firstpost when it's done here.
To prevent uberweapons that do tons of damage and are pratically indestructable, all pats of the robot's durability, including the weapon, are equal to the armor stat.
And to prevent plowbots from royally owning FBSs, no armor +2 rule.
Considering that will screw charybids over a bit, you're free to redo the stats. Once again I apologize, I can't belive I forgot about that.
-
- Posts: 1057
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
- Location: Fort Bragg, NC
-
- Posts: 2819
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Somewhat Insane Robotic Elimination Challenge
Updated Sand Crab pic inserted, and pinned, since Anthony can't do it for himself.
-
- Posts: 1140
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
- Contact:
Somewhat Insane Robotic Elimination Challenge
Much appreciated, Philip.
3 more...It'll take some time since some haven't made their bots yet...but eventually, this will start, since minion, MR, and FAAAACE all have a chance of joining.
3 more...It'll take some time since some haven't made their bots yet...but eventually, this will start, since minion, MR, and FAAAACE all have a chance of joining.