New stat system proposal

playzooki · Post by **playzooki** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:11 pm

http://www.mediafire.com/?g9zp2aa9pu04ki2
Discuss

Probably Rob · Post by **Probably Rob** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:22 pm

Why must it be a downloadable file?

Post by **That Kode Guy** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:28 pm

Yeah, that's not a good idea playzooki. It should at least be put down here. The file could become lost or corrupted.

Anyway, here's what was in the document:

<blockquote class='quote_blockquote'><dl><dt>Quote:</dt><dd> </dd></dl><div>New CFL stat system

NOTE: The calculations are rough measures, not exact terms. If the recoil probability is .5, we wont flip a coin.

AMOUNT OF POINTS

Wheeled/treaded/flying/shuffling robots- SHW-150 HW-100 MW-50 LW-25

Walkers

Post by **That Kode Guy** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:32 pm

Myself, I am not behind giving different point totals for different weight classes. This hasn't been the first time it's been brought up before, though. Lewis and a few others brought it up, but we shot it down. We know well enough that a greater weight class bot will smush a lower weight class bot easily. Unless you're fighting anything of Sparkey's. :P

Probably Rob · Post by **Probably Rob** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:33 pm

I vote no. Too complex.

NWOWWE · Post by **NWOWWE** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:40 pm

Yeah, there's really not much point to having different stat totals for different weight classes.

playzooki · Post by **playzooki** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:46 pm

well fine, but what would you say be standard

Probably Rob · Post by **Probably Rob** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:48 pm

Well, what we have now.

GF93 · Post by **GF93** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:50 pm

<blockquote class='quote_blockquote'><dl><dt>KodeBreaker</dt><dd>Aug 7 2013, 02:32 PM</dd></dl><div> Unless you're fighting anything of Sparkey's. :P [/quote]
Ah yes. I remember thinking I could kick a hole in some of them in one go. Much like his cardboard boxes. :P

playzooki · Post by **playzooki** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 3:05 pm

Please bear in mind this is a rough draft.

Post by **MadBull** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:04 pm

looked through the document... these are things that, with some tweaking, could work, fairly confident about that...

what is on my mind though... what is your unique selling point? do your ideas solve existing problems or improve ARC in any way? could you expand on that a bit?

MassimoV · Post by **MassimoV** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:45 pm

No. I just learned this system. I don't want everything changing on me.

Post by **Badnik96** » Sat Aug 10, 2013 1:48 pm

I don't like math. Too much work.

So yeah.

playzooki · Post by **playzooki** » Sat Aug 10, 2013 2:46 pm

<blockquote class='quote_blockquote'><dl><dt>Badnik96</dt><dd>Aug 10 2013, 01:48 PM</dd></dl><div>I don't like math. Too much work.

So yeah.[/quote]You already use it now.

Post by **MadBull** » Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:31 pm

<blockquote class='quote_blockquote'><dl><dt>MadBull</dt><dd>Aug 7 2013, 04:04 PM</dd></dl><div>looked through the document... these are things that, with some tweaking, could work, fairly confident about that...

what is on my mind though... what is your unique selling point? do your ideas solve existing problems or improve ARC in any way? could you expand on that a bit?[/quote]